Thursday, May 13, 2010

David Horowitz at UCSD 5/10/2010. Hosted by Young Americans for Freedom and DHFC

Video showing a UCSD student unwilling to condemn a U.S recognized terrorst group.
Video Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8fSvyv0urTE

No comments:

Equal rights under God:

Sharia Rights vs Inalienable Rights

What is a "right?" Where do our laws come from? Many people take their values from their upbringing and cultural values for granted; they never really question their sense of right and wrong.

The key purpose of this blog is to show the historical difference between Judaic/Christian Law in the West and Islamic, Sharia Law in the East. That Judaic/Christian Laws have differed historically from Islamic Law, both in principle and application. Principally how the Old Testament and the New Testament teaches that the civil magistrate had one law for both the the believer and unbeliever and how Islamic law has two sets of laws (or rules) for the civil magistrate to use for the unbeliever and the Muslim.

Quite simply, there is a real, historical difference in the Islamic legal code providing greater protection, favoring and rewarding Muslims and less protection and rights for non Muslims.

Our generation is experiencing the greatest Islamic revival in over 1,400 years. Global War on Terrorism is a misnomer. It should be the global war against Islamic Imperialism through the implementation of djizya and Sharia law.

THE CORE DIFFERENCE:

Each act of "terrorism", rape, torture, mutilation, and forced coercion is both a violation of one of the Ten Commandments, a sin against God. Each act of jihad is a violation against God's law and, as a consequence, a sin against God, who one day they will stand before to give an account how they continually violated God's Ten Words and silenced their conscience that has the law of God written on their hearts.

This blog is for the person in the middle who does not know where the West got their laws and does not know Islamic, Sharia Law. This blog was designed to show truthful, historical and accurate justapositions of the two contradictory systems of law and civil rights.

Slowly over two millinea, Western laws have developed from the Old and New Testament. From the introduction of Christianity to the West, laws slowly developed from a transformed culture of paganism to some form of a Christian culture. The Magna Carta derived a set of rights for the individual; it declared that kings were no longer above God's Law, but were to be shepherd kings over their subjects (as the Kings of Israel old). They were to search out the Scriptures for wisdom, memorize it and be directed and guided by the Law of God found in the Old and New Testaments all the days of their lives. From the Bible, John Locke derived his three inalienable rights for the individual: Life, Liberty and Property. From the Bible we have The Declaration of Independence, and The Bill of Rights, and some form of constitutional government all over the world which gives individuals certain inalienable rights. The effects have been profound.

But these rights are under attack again. The West thought their greatest threat against these rights was defeated, with the so call "fall of communism", but an ancient force has gained new vitality and is rising up to threaten, Life, Liberty and Property: Islam.

By comparison and contrast my goal was to show a steady flow from the Old Testament Mosaic Law, to the Magna Carta, to the Protestant Reformation, up to the founding of the United States under the U.S. Constitution, acknowledging, appealing and struggling for for these principles for all mankind.

Sharia vs Inalienable Rights

Thursday, May 13, 2010

David Horowitz at UCSD 5/10/2010. Hosted by Young Americans for Freedom and DHFC

Video showing a UCSD student unwilling to condemn a U.S recognized terrorst group.

Video Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8fSvyv0urTE

Video Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8fSvyv0urTE

No comments:

Blog Archive

My Position: Reason for This Blog