Thursday, March 27, 2008

Fitna The Movie Released

FITNA is a decent documentary by Dutch Member of Parliament, Geert Wilders. Fitna offers no commentary or critque against Islam; the movie only shows footage from esteemed teachers and terrorists.  The video does show how specific verses in the Koran (that have been used throughout Islamic history) are still being used today by modern Islamists to wage deadly jihad against all non-Muslims. The message is clear. A global Islamic revival is occurring in our times that is unprecedented since the Islamic invasions of Europe during the Reformation. Their goal is clear: Global domination of all people, submitted to Allah, under Sharia Law.

As my Persian friend said after watching the video,

We're dealing with multiple Hitlers now. Each one of these clergymen has the potential to be one. Together, they are more lethal than Hitler.

My Persian friend continues, "One thing that's very sad is that our own leaders in government have betrayed the American people, and have occupied their minds with mortgage issues rather than fighting Islamic terrorism. Islamic terrorism has become number 10 in our national priorities. We did this to ourselves."

Link to FITNA the movie:

Friday, March 14, 2008

Hamas Admits Using Civilians as Human Shields

"A prominent member of Hamas, a recognized terrorist group, has been captured on video boasting of using women, children and the elderly as human shields in its firefights with Israeli soldiers", reported World Net Daily.

In fact, many Palestinians have recorded these occurrences on their own cell phones, with Islamists picking up small children and running with them as the Israelis follow in hot pursuit--an AK-47 in one hand and a small child in the other.

Sharia Vs. Inalienable Rights has often put forward the following hypothetical question:

"Would the Islamists hold their fire if a Jew held a small child as a shield, or was in a house full of women and children?" No. Of course not. Those are the ones the Palestinians target with rockets, bombs, and sniper attacks.

Curiously, for those who want to defend Islam that the behavior of Hamas, the PLO, and other Muslim groups do not represent Islam, they must be reminded that there are other religious and ethnic minorities within the Palestinian borders who do not engage in any warfare whatsoever: Christian Palestinians are NOT bombing Israel on an almost daily basis. The only religious groups doing so are Islamic.

Let us repeat the matter: "Since God does not rejoice in the death of the wicked, neither should YOU!"

Video Link:

Link to WND Article:

Monday, March 10, 2008

Rejoice Not

A fundamental difference between Judeo/Christian and Islamic Values
Every time I see pictures of Muslims rejoicing in the death of the "wicked" (from their point of view), as seen in the photograph on the left of Palestinian Muslims celebrating the murder of eight Jewish seminary students on March 9th, I think of a verse a Christian pastor pointed out over 20 years ago: "Since God does not rejoice in the death of the wicked, neither should YOU!"

"As I live, declares the Lord GOD,I have NO pleasure in the death of the wicked"
The question must follow: 
"Should the Muslim have pleasure in the death of the 'wicked'?"  
Bible Proofs: 
  • Ezekiel 33:11: "Say to them, As I live, declares the Lord GOD,I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked, but that the wicked turn from his way and live;turn back, turn back from your evil ways, for why will you die, O house of Israel?
  • Ezekiel 18:23 (New King James Version)Have I any pleasure at all that the wicked should die? saith the Lord GOD: and not that he should return from his ways, and live?
  • Ezekiel 18:32: "For I have no pleasure in the death of anyone, declares the Lord GOD; so turn, and live."

Thursday, February 14, 2008

Josephs' Tomb: "This holy Muslim site!"

Apparently, Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas believes Joseph was a "holy Muslim" and referred to "both the shrine andthe biblical patriarch as 'Muslim'". If that's so, then why have the Muslims been attacking the tomb for decades?.

Should these people who blasphemed one of Allah's prophets, by destroying his tomb, be put to death according to Islam?

"We are going to guardthis holy Muslim site," he said. Has it ever been considered holy byMuslims before? Is this the first time it's been designated as holy? He says he going "to find out who was behind the fire". While that happens the world is waiting to see if all the Muslims will take to the streets, smash cars, demand the death penalty for insulting Allah's "holy muslim" (a blasphemy), just like Michelle Gibbons experienced when naming a stuffed teady bear Mohammed.

Link to Article:

Wednesday, February 13, 2008

Palestinians Burn Joseph's Tomb

We have seen for months now that it is a sin in Islam to defame anything associated with Allah's prophets. Mohammed acknowledged and adopted both the OT and NT prophets. Joseph is an Old Testament prophet. Joseph's tomb is the third most holy site in Judaism. If Joseph is also prophet of Allah, wouldn't this be the same as defaming one of Islam's holy sites? Shouldn't these people who blasphemed one of God's prophets by destroying his tomb be put to death according to Islam?

Bible refresher:

Many people do not know their Bibles, and tragically, neither do most Muslims. And it's far more easier to read than the Koran. The language is simple and direct, and it's almost entirely chronological in its historical narrative.

What makes a Prophet? Did you know that Abraham is called a prophet?

Genesis 20:7 [God speaking to Pharaoh] "Now therefore, restore the man's wife, for he is a prophet, and hewill pray for you and you will live. But if you do not restore her,know that you shall surely die, you and all who are yours."

The story of Joseph is definitely worth familiarizing yourself with; it's one of the best stories in the Old Testament.

Re: Joseph's stature as a prophet.

Joseph is definitely a prophet for the same reason as Daniel is considered a prophet: they both received "prophetic dreams" (i.e., events of the future) . Joseph gave God the glory for this and so did Daniel. Better yet. So did pagan Pharaoh and Nebuchadnezzar in both instances, which is very important. Both acknowledged that the god of Joseph and Daniel ordains, controls, and directs the events of men and history.

Genesis 41:15-16Pharaoh said to Joseph, "I have had a dream, but no one can interpretit; and I have heard it said about you, that when you hear a dream youcan interpret it."
Joseph then answered Pharaoh, saying, " It is not in me; God will givePharaoh a favorable answer."

Genesis 41:38Then Pharaoh said to his servants, "Can we find a man like this, inwhom is a divine spirit?"

So Pharaoh said to Joseph, "Since God has informed you of all this,there is no one so discerning and wise as you are.
Comparisons of Daniel the prophet:

Nebuchadnezzar later acknowledges that the god of Daniel is the only true God because of the abilitites to understand his dreams and tell of things that will come to pass. Both Daniel and Joseph are interpreters of dreams and both world rulers at the time acknowledge the god of Israel.

Daniel 4:34"But at the end of that period, I, Nebuchadnezzar, raised my eyestoward heaven and my reason returned to me, and I blessed the MostHigh and praised and honored Him who lives forever;For His dominion isan everlasting dominion,And His kingdom endures from generation togeneration.

Daniel 4:37"Now I, Nebuchadnezzar, praise, exalt and honor the King of heaven,for all His works are true and His ways just, and He is able to humblethose who walk in pride."

God (Allah according to Muslims) raised Joseph up to "save many lives", the entire egyptian nation, as well as the 72 Jews in the story, of which many should thank God if they can trace their ancestry back as egyptian and Jewish. They may not be here today if it were not for Joseph. Both Muslim and Jews should be celebrating the work God did through the life Joseph, and should be modelling his behavior.

Back to the original question:

Mohammed acknowledged and adopted both the OT and NT prophets. Joseph is an Old Testament prophet. If Joseph is a prophet of Allah, wouldn't this be the same as defaming one of Islam's holy sites?

Shouldn't these people who blasphemed one of Allah's prophets by destroying his tomb be put to death according to Islam?

Where are the screaming Muslims demanding demanding the blood of these Muslims? Instead we have another eerie silence throughout the Islamic world.

We at Sharia vs Inalienable Rights are
not calling for the death penalty for vandalism. Vandalism carries its own penalties under the Bible called "restitution". Under the Old Testament Law, a person had to restore fore-fold--either for stealing or destorying another's personal property. The cutting off of a hand for theft is not in the Bible. However, restitution is the punishment for theft. 

Sharia vs Inalienable rights is calling Muslim leaders to hold those responsible accountable for their actions and restore the damages--either through monetary restitution or manual labor. Love God with all your strength and mind, and your neighbor as yourself. This fulfills the Law and the Prophets.

Link to Article:

Friday, February 8, 2008

A New Form of Plundering: Welfare for Polygamous Unions

Mumtaz Ali, president of the Canadian Society of Muslims doesn't seem to mind violating the 8th, and 9th Commandments through the means of socialized welfare. He seems to know little about the social ramifications of how God's law is supposed to protect the rights of the individuals, not plunder them. But first, let's remember that Islam started with raiding parties that plundered, kidnapped, raped, and sold into slavery their captives. Arabs were notoriously known before Mohammed for subsisting via raiding parties. Mohammed simply codified and canonized their age-0ld practice of breaking the 8th, 9th, and 10th Commandments, to grow and subsidize his new religion. He arose as a "Prophet" and immediately began to violate the Ten Commandments. Plundering has continued through the history of Islam, and it has taken many forms thoughout its history. But today there is a very easy way for Muslims to plunder their neighbor's wealth, without ever drawing the Scimitar from its sheath. It's called Socialism.

"Hundreds of GTA Muslim men in polygamous marriages -- some with a harem of wives -- are receiving welfare and social benefits for each of their spouses, thanks to the city and province, Muslim leaders say." Toronto

Link to Article:

Monday, January 21, 2008

Outrageously dangerous behavior at the Pentagon

"Coughlin, the military's top authority on Islamic war doctrine, was pushed out of the Pentagon, where he worked as an intelligence analyst for the Joint Chiefs of Staff, after a high-level Muslim official protested his making a connection between Islamic law and terror."

"More disturbing, the Pentagon seems to have been infiltrated at high levels by Islamist sympathizers, who are throwing sand in the eyes of decision makers. Some, like England, are already blind, apparently more concerned with political correctness than protecting the nation."

Link to Artile:

Friday, January 18, 2008

Brittish Government to rename terrorism to "Anti-Islamic Behavior"

Sharia vs. Inalienable Rights has always argued that the term "War on Terrorism" was not descript enough. When criminals act in the name of a theological or ideological world view, they should be coined by the philosophical view that drives them. Mary Anne Weaver called them "Islamists". In the pre 9/11 word, no one had a problem with this term. Criminals yes. But let's not forget what ideological wolrd-view motivates them. The source is the Koran. The command is from Mohammed.

Link to Article:

Iran's Ayatollah: West Abuses Women, Islam Honors Them

While Iran's Ayatollah claims that the West abuses women, and Islam honors them, the picture to the left shows a woman who was "honored" with a beating by the moral police for not wearing a veil.

Link to Article:

Tuesday, January 8, 2008

An “Apostate” Speaks

Outstanding article, with copious citations from the Koran

"Frontpage Interview’s guest today is Abul Kasem, an ex-Muslim who is the author of hundreds of articles and several books on Islam including, Women in Islam. He was a contributor to the book Leaving Islam – Apostates Speak Out as well as to Beyond Jihad: Critical Views From Inside Islam."


Kasem: Born in Bangladesh, I attended the secular schools as well as underwent strict religious discipline, and digested religious preaching. Taught by my father, during my childhood, I learned the basic Qur’an without understanding a single word, because like almost all Muslims of Bangladesh, my father did not know the meaning of Arabic words. He only knew how to read the Qur’an in Arabic, and recite it. When I was nine, a typical Mulla taught me the Islamic rituals (like prayer, ablution, fasting), and how to recite the Qur’an correctly. He also taught us that Muslims are the only inheritors of the earth, that we must never mix with the non-Muslims, we must hate them, humiliate them verbally, and if possible, physically.

FP: So share with us a bit of what you discovered in Islam.
Kasem: Ok, here is a bit of my education:

  • Prophet said- we will go to attack them (i.e. the infidels) and they will not come to attack us.–Sahih Bukhari, 5.59.435.
  • Prophet allowed rape of war-captives.–Sahih Bukhari, 3.46.718.
  • Muslim soldiers had sex with the captive women in the presence of their husbands and “some were reluctant to do so”.–Sunaan Abu Dawud 11.2150.
  • One can have sexual intercourse with a captive woman after she is clear of her period and/or delivery. If she has a husband then her marriage is abrogated after she becomes a captive - Sahih Muslim 8.3432.

Link to Article:

Bishop warns of no-go zones for non-Muslims

The London Times is reporting the following article:

"Islamic extremists have created 'no-go' areas across Britain where it is too dangerous for non-Muslims to enter, one of the Church of England's most senior bishops warns today.

Bishop Nazir-Ali, who was born in Pakistan, gives warning that attempts are being made to give Britain an increasingly Islamic character by introducing the call to prayer and wider use of sharia law, a legal system based on the Koran.

The overwhelming majority - 80 per cent - said that the Government has not upheld the place of religion in public life and up to 63 per cent fear that the Church will be disestablished within a generation, breaking a bond that has existed between the Church and State since the Reformation."

Link to article:;jsessionid=NWTMO0LU2LHGHQFIQMGSFFWAVCBQWIV0?xml=/news/2008/01/06/nislam106.xml&posted=true&_requestid=25981

Tuesday, January 1, 2008

By Preaching or by Force

“We want Islamic law for all Pakistan and then the world.
We would like to do this by preaching. But if not then we would use force.”

Rehamn, 60, spoke in the Pakistani town of Kahuta as the call to prayer echoed over the dusty streets. He is Imam of the town’s fundamentalist religious school or madrassa, where classes for kids as young as nine include Jihad or Holy War and barbaric punishments", reported The Sun.

The Imam would like to bring Islamic law for all to Pakistan and around the world by preaching alone; however, he's fighting against the odds of his very own religion. No Islamic country has ever become Islamic without force.

George Grant responded: "Several correspondents have recently asked me about the history and character of Islamic imperialism, conquest, and terror across the centuries. In my lectures on Islam, I often refer to the fact that no nation has ever willingly converted to Islam."

"Every scrap of land, every person, every tribe, and every country currently under Muslim dominion was forcibly conquered and brought into submission--which probably should not surprise us since'submission' is actually the meaning of the word 'Islam.' This is a fact, however, often denied by modern historiography--citing the isolated and unusual instances of Malaysia and Indonesia which were conquered, but by Muslim pirates rather than by Muslim armies."

View the blog for Tuesday, April 24, 2007:
“I’m ready to become a suicide bomber and lay down my life for Islam. Democracy is wrong. Earth belongs to God and God’s law must be implemented"

Terrified Kenyan families burnt alive in church as post-election violence escalates

The International Herald Tribune reported the following:

"In broad daylight, a crowd of Kenyans set a church filled with hundreds of terrified families on fire and listened to them scream as flames engulfed them, according to witnesses including police and a Red Cross volunteer."

"Those who escaped the building were hunted down with machetes; others hid inside pit latrines."

"Up to 50 people were killed in the attack, said a Red Cross official who asked that her name — which would identify her tribe — not be published to protect her from reprisals. Even first aid workers were stopped by vigilante gangs who demanded their identity."

The attack Tuesday was the ugliest incident yet since last week's disputed elections unleashed a torrent of ethnic and political violence that has claimed at least 270 lives.

Link to Article: