Monday, May 28, 2007

The Muslim Students Association in the U.S.

Family Security Matters, has a good article on the
"delorable deeds" of The Muslim Students Association in the U.S. There are some very disturbing things happening at U.C. Irvine, as well as other U.C. California univerities. Should we be surprised?

Link to Article:
http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/homeland.php?id=1009075

Sunday, May 27, 2007

Al-Qaeda Torture Manual

“There is no doubt that Allah commanded us to strike the Kuffar (unbelievers), kill them, and fight them by all means necessary to achieve the goal.

The servants of Allah... are permitted to use any and all means necessary to strike the active unbeliever combatants for the purpose of killing them...

The goal must be pursued even if the means to accomplish it affect both the intended active fighters and unintended passive ones such as women, children and any other passive category specified by our jurisprudence.”

Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, Sunni terrorist known for decapitating the Kuffar (unbelievers)

Link to Article:

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2007/0524072torture1.html

Thursday, May 24, 2007

Londonistan: The New England

How Britain is losing its heritage in a single generation.

Sharia vs Inalienable Rights argues that those nations which do not take into consideration those applicants for naturalization who hold political or religious world-views that anti-thetical to inalienable rights are creating a grave threat to their nation's future posterity.

Link to Article:
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2007/06/hitchens200706?printable=true&currentPage=all

Quotes: Nature of Islam

The Religion of Peace.com is an excellent source for quotes about Islamic history and daily statistics documenting the violation of human rights.

Iran
“Those who know nothing of Islam pretend that Islam counsels against war. Those who say this are witless. Islam says: 'Kill all the unbelievers just as they would kill you all! Kill them, put them to the sword and scatter their armies.'”




The Ayatollah Khomeini

Sudan
"To Fight and Conquer. Death in the name of Allah."


The unit logo of the Janjaweed militia, responsible for “cleansing” Darfur of African people along with the rape of thousands of women.


"Long live the Mujahideen"
Sudanese President, Omar al-Bahir, at a meeting of Janjaweed fighters.

“Jihad is a duty.”
The constitution of the Islamic Republic of Sudan

United Kingdom
“Our religion is Islam - obedience to the one true God, Allah, and following the footsteps of the final prophet and messenger Muhammad... This is how our ethical stances are dictated. “


Mohammad Sidique Khan, London subway bomber, explaining his motives on a pre-recorded video tape.

United States
"I did not act out of hatred for Americans, but love for Allah instead. I live only to serve Allah by obeying all of Allah’s commandments, of which I am aware by reading and learning the contents of the Koran.”



Mohammed Reza Taheri-Azar, explaining (in his words) “reasons for premeditating and attempting to murder citizens and residents of the United States of America.” He also quoted 141 verses from the Qur'an.

Iraq (Sunni)
“There is no doubt that Allah commanded us to strike the Kuffar (unbelievers), kill them, and fight them by all means necessary to achieve the goal. The servants of Allah who perform Jihad to elevate the word (laws) of Allah, are permitted to use any and all means necessary to strike the active unbeliever combatants for the purpose of killing them, snatch their souls from their body, cleanse the earth from their abomination, and lift their trial and persecution of the servants of Allah. The goal must be pursued even if the means to accomplish it affect both the intended active fighters and unintended passive ones such as women, children and any other passive category specified by our jurisprudence.”

Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, Sunni terrorist known for cutting captives’ throats

Iraq (Shia)
“My motivation is a sense of duty toward my religious faith to fight against any hostile enemy of Islam.”


Abu Deraa, Shitte terrorist known for drilling into captive’s heads


Turkey
“The Koran says: ‘Fight them until evil disappears and all religion becomes Allah's [religion].' The suicide activists who blow themselves up are carrying out the Koran's commandment.’"


Ali Osman Zor, Great East Islamic Raiders Front terrorist organization


Sources: The Religion of Peace

Tuesday, May 22, 2007

"One in four" of U.S. Muslims under 30 "say suicide bombings to defend their religion are acceptable at least in some circumstances"

The Associated Press is reporting today that, "One in four" of U.S. Muslims under 30 "say suicide bombings to defend their religion are acceptable at least in some circumstances".

That's right. They're here! And that's the mess we're in. That's what we get when America does not take seriously the threats that confront our national posterity.

Sharia vs Inalienable Rights has been calling for a policy change in D.C, curtailing Muslims from immigrating into the U.S. Those who profess any political and or religious views, or hold to ideologies that are anti-thetical to inalienable rights, will in time compromise the safety and security of the citizens within.

In our April blog we made the case that Islam is an expansionist, revolutionary ideology: the goal is to chip away at the nations until all men submit to Allah and his prophet.

We also argued in the same blog entry that Islam has a track record showing that no Muslim country that exist today became Islamic peaceably--every Muslim nation that exists today was conquered by the sword.

The greater picture may be that, given enough time, if there is a big enough shift in the population in a few generations, we may find America in the same spot of England today, or given greater time, like Lebanon: a fractured and fragmented society, hosting "state within a state". And in time inalienable rights will slowly be eroded into something that no longer resembles truly historic rights.

It is the solemn duty of our elected officials to uphold the Constitution and protect the citizens who are living here now, and ensure our future by weighing the threats that confront our nation.

To curtail the influx of Muslim immigrants into the U.S.,write your representative today

Link to Article:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070522/ap_on_re_us/poll_muslim_americans;_ylt=ArQ4KPLfQzAxaovPXsls0S6s0NUE

Write Your Representative:
http://www.house.gov/writerep/

Friday, May 18, 2007

Terrorism, a Generation Growing

Blair has got that right. Terrorism, (i.e., imperialistic, orthodox Islam) has been a generation growing.

I just listened to an excellent interview with Tony Blair on NPR (a must listen). He recognizes the time required to battle the imperialistic vision of Islamic global domination will take much time:

"This terrorism has been a generation growing; it will take a generation to knock it out." Tony Blair


Saddam Hussein's regime was a Terrost State
No one doubted that Saddam was aggressively seeking to acquire WoMD. No one doubted that he would have posed a tremendous threat if had them.

Saddam's support for terrorism in Palestine--paying $20k-$30k per family for each suicide attacker--made certain that he had no reservations on exporting terrorism abroad. By definition, that support made Saddam Hussein's regime a terrorist state.

Not finding WoMD in Iraq was a good thing, the world is a safer place because they did not exist, and despite NOT finding WoMD in Iraq, the battle by others to acquire them goes on. In short, Saddam was one of many terrorist states/organizations that desire to have them. The Bush and Blair administrations should have hammered this point more persuasively for the last four years, as a policy stance.

What would the security concerns be now, if Saddam had developed WoMD? The world would be asking,
  • How much did he make?
  • Who else has access to WoMD ?
  • Would Saddam use WoMD ?
  • Would Saddam "launder" WoMD to others?
  • Is it possible that terrorists could get at Saddam's WoMD ?

It's shameful how many have capitalized on the Bush and Blair administrations for not finding Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq. By weaking our resolve to secure democracy in Iraq, I sumbit they are making the world a less safer place, if they succeed in a pullout. Although it's nice to find a smoking gun to prove that your actions were justified. For world security purposes, it does not leave a lot of questions un-answered--questions that would have arisen if Saddam had developed them: How did he get them, what are his sources, who else is involved, who else could have them? It had always been a question of when Saddam would have acquired WoMD.





Link to Article: (Click the "Listen" button, right below the article's title):
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=10237248



Tuesday, May 15, 2007

Bennie Thompson vs. terrorism tipsters

A Letter to The U.S. House of Representatives

Dear [Representative's Name here]

The Washington Times is reporting today (05/15/07) that "if a House Democrat manages to kill a tipster-immunity measure under consideration in Congress this month, people who report suspicious behavior could be sued in civil court if the accused are not charged with a crime."

If this is true, our citizens will be unprotected. Therefore, I urge not to be a supporter of this bill. I also ask you to push the Department of Justice to prosecute these six imams, who are trying to shake down the U.S. Airways industry, chip away at our security, and intimidate our citizens with law suits.

If this bill becomes law, then the inalienable right of lawful self-defense, self-preservation, and security will be violated. If this bill becomes law, then our elected officials have abandoned us and trampled under foot one of our most cherished rights: "Freedom from Fear".

Is it NOT the solemn duty of our elected officials to uphold the Constitution and protect the people within its borders, and ensure the security of our future by weighing the threats that confront our nation?


Link to Washington Times Article:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/op-ed/20070514-093346-1946r.htm

Sincerely,
[Add Your Name Here]

Sunday, May 13, 2007

FBI Warns Domestic Islamic Threats Growing

USA Today reported that the FBI and other security officials are warning that "American-based Islamic terrorists with no direct ties to international terror networks form a large and growing threat to the American homeland."

"The trend we're seeing is that we are uncovering more instances of people here who have been radicalized … where there is not a direct thumbprint of al-Qaeda," said John Miller, the FBI's assistant director for public affairs.

In the April issue of this blog, we noted the Policy of U.S. Immigration should be changed to only allow those groups that will support inalienable rights in practice.

No doubt, by allowing Islamists to immigrate into the U.S., who indoctrinate their children in the manner of Hamas, we will begin to see, in a generation or two (10-20 years), the same type of home grown Islamic militants we see in foreign countries today. If there is a big enough shift in the population in a few generations, we may see inalienable rights swept away, with Sharia Law as the replacement...

If in name only, "rights" may be redeifined into something that no longer resembles those rights which are taught in the Ten Commandments, the Magna Carta, Lex Rex, the U.S. Constitution, and the Bill of Rights.

The U.S. Needs to re-think its long term strategy regarding its policy on immigration.

Who wants too see America torn like Lebanon or as England is beginning to experience in 50 years? The writing is on the wall.

April Blog over Immigration Theory:
http://shariavsinalienablerights.blogspot.com/2007/04/gates-of-paradise-are-under-shadows-of.html

Link to Article:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2007-05-13-homegrown-bottomstrip_N.htm?csp=34

Friday, May 11, 2007

Hamas Refuses to Stop Jihadist Romper Room TV Show

There is an error in The The Middle East Times' reporting. Hamas's Mickey character WAS NOT only urging resistance against Israel, but WAS ALSO teaching global Islamic imperialism.
"RAMALLAH, West Bank -- A Hamas-run television channel has defied a Palestinian government request to axe a controversial children's cartoon in which a Mickey Mouse look-alike urges resistance against Israel, reported The Middle East Times.

Transcript of Hamas TV Show:

Farfour (Mickey Character) tells Saraa that they are being prepared for Islamic imperialism.

"We've said more than once that becoming masters of the world requires the following: First, to be happy with our Arabic language, which once upon a time ruled this world." [emphasis added]

The Islamists are grooming their children for global conquest, not just local nationalism.

MemriTv.org Transcript of Hamas TV Show:
http://www.memritv.org/Transcript.asp?P1=1442

Article Link:
http://www.metimes.com/storyview.php?StoryID=20070510-082538-3237r

Wednesday, May 9, 2007

It's Ok to Kill Children in Battle, Says Sheik


"The deputy spiritual leader of Sheik Taj Din al-Hilali has told his students that it is "obligatory" for all Muslims to engage in jihad if an Islamic country is under attack, even if it means killing the enemy's children."

"Sheik Shady Suleiman, a youth leader at Lakemba Mosque in Sydney's southeast, told his students in a one-hour Arabic and English lecture that it would be "self defence" to kill children who were attacking them in battle," reported The Australian.

In defense of his statements The Australian has the sheik on record saying, "When I said children, I did not mean, of course, if you're going to get a five- or seven-year-old coming to attack you, you can stop him," he said yesterday. I was talking about self-defence. If you get attacked by someone, then you have the right to defend yourself. It doesn't mean you go kill them, especially if it's someone young."

Link to Article:
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,21695697-5006784,00.html

Hezbollah Sets Up Base in South America


In light of a growing concern for tighter control over our U.S. borders and national security, the concern seems even greater with the news that Hezbollah has established a base in South America. Historically, South America is a non-Muslim area of the world--with no historic ties to the land, or religion. But that doesn't stop Hezbollah from employing the same rhetoric of defense of ones country to invaders and sacrafice of martyrdom as seen in Lebannon.

It's the same old sounding marxist rhetoric the Islamists have adopted for their goal of Islamic Imperialism: Create an imaginary crisis, and then use it as a pretense for war.

But the pretense is the same in Paraguay as that used in Lebannon: to grow into a "state withing a state". They like to say that "you need us here to defend against the "aggresors" and "occupiers", when most people in their regions only want peace.

I see this article as a good reason why tighter security on our borders is necessary. It's also a great reason to draw closer with those bordering nations and root Hezbolla out, before they have any grounds (no pun intended) to claim they have an historic attachement to that land.

"'We are Muslims. I am Hezbollah.'Mustafa Khalil Meri, a Hezbollah militiaman in Paraguay, says the militant Islamist group would take violent revenge inside the United States if it were to attack Iran", reported MSNBC.
Link to Article:

Mickey Teaches Islamic Imperialism

Following are excerpts from a children's TV show, which aired on Al-Aqsa TV on April 6-13, 2007:

Host Saraa, a young girl: Sanabel, what will you do for the sake of the Al-Aqsa Mosque? How will you sacrifice your soul for the sake of Al-Aqsa? What will you do?

Sanabel, young girl on phone: I will shoot.

Farfour, a Mickey Mouse character in a tuxedo: Sanabel, what should we do if we want to liberate...

Sanable: We want to fight.

Farfour: We got that. What else?

Saraa: We want to...

Sanabel: We will annihilate the Jews.

Saraa: We are defending Al-Aqsa with our souls and our blood, aren't we, Sanabel?

Sanabel: I will commit martyrdom.

[...]

Farfour (Mickey Character): We've said more than once that becoming masters of the world requires the following: First, to be happy with our Arabic language, which once upon a time ruled this world.

Saraa: Of course.

Farfour: Second... or maybe that's it?

Adult host: Farfour, I heard you talking in English.

Farfour: Yes. How are you, Saraa? I hope to be good time.

Saraa: What's with you, Farfour? Why are talking this way? Didn't we agree to talk in literary Arabic?

Farfour: But Saraa, this is the language of the advanced world, the language of the world that understands and invents things, isn't it?

Saraa: No, Farfour, you are wrong, because you don't know that the Muslims are the basis of civilization. If not for the Muslims, the world wouldn't have got to where it is today.

[...]

Farfour: My dear youngsters, we're back. We always miss seeing you on your weekly program "The Pioneers of Tomorrow," in which we are placing together the cornerstone for the ruling of the world by an Islamic leadership.

Transcript provided by MemriTv.org:
http://www.memritv.org/Transcript.asp?P1=1442

Tuesday, May 8, 2007

ACLU Sues North Carolina Court Over Bible

"A lawsuit filed by the ACLU of North Carolina challenges a state policy that allows only the Bible to be used in such court procedures." The premise by the ACLU is "If the state is going to get into the religious oath business, the state has to be fair," said Seth Cohen, the ACLU's lead counsel on the case, " reported Fox News.
It seems to me that the ACLU is a few steps from drawing the conclusion that if a person doesn't have to swear an oath on a book they don't believe in, and if they don't have to swear on the book that is the foundation for this nation's civil rights and ethics, then neither should they be judged by them. In fact, they want to move in the direction where first, the Bible is not allowed to be recognized as the foundation for ethics and civil rights in this country, and second, as a multicultural society, they should NOT be judged by any other set of religious or cultural beliefs other than their own.

Is it conceivable that the ACLU would argue for a case like this? If so, in the Muslim community they wouldn't be in want of clients to represent.

Muslims in England, in Canada, and in the United States have started to demand that they only be held accountable by Sharia--the beliefs they have submitted themselves to. And if Muslims are granted that "special" treatment, then in all fairness, why shouldn't atheists demand that the courts only judge them by their own atheistic beliefs. And for that matter, why shouldn't unionized industries and guilds demand that they only be judged by their corporate charters and mission statements for their industry practices?

This makes a mockery of the court system, and begins to make void the U.S Constitution.

If groups could only be judged by their own beliefs, most people---as of today--would see that as the breakdown of society, returning us to tribalism and clans.

The problem with the premise stated by the ACLU is that the United States 1. has always been in the business of swearing in, and 2. the United States was NOT founded by the Koran or another religious book that the nation's ethical and moral laws are derived.

The Courts use the Bible because it is the court itself--not necessarily the person being sworn in--that recognizes the authority of the Bible as the basis for civil law in our society.

It also signifies that the Court is comprised of finite humans who error in judgment, lack omniscience, and that even if the court misses its execution in justice, he/she who has sworn in has done so in the presence of God, the judge of all the earth. Even if the person escapes temporal judgment, they can not escape the final judgment.

"But an attorney from the state Attorney General's Office urged Wake County Superior Court Judge Paul Ridgeway to dismiss the case. "The main complaint of the ACLU and the plaintiff is a political one, not a legal one,' attorney Valerie Bateman said."

It's another attempt by the ACLU to knock out from under the nation, its ultimate authority, its foundations of ethical law and human rights.

Link to Article:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,270777,00.html

Hamas TV indoctrinates Tomorrow's Pioneers.

Yesterday Fox News reported that Hamaz TV has and indoctrination program which uses a Mickey Mouse look-a-like, to indoctrinate children into militant Islamists, glorifying suicide attacks, hand grenade thowing, and machine firing upon civilians.

Called "Tomorrow's Pioneers", an apparent pun on Walt Disney's racoon skin hats doned by children during the Daniel Boone TV era, the children are taught to play as American children once did about the Pioneer days of wagon trains and fighting indians. But now, with the same glee, Palestianian children pretend to shoot and bomb both Jews and Americans to clear the way for a glorious Islamic state with Jerusalem as the capital.

The Muslims like to rub our noses in our own history as they knowingly commit their own forms of attrocities.

"We, tomorrow’s pioneers, will restore to this nation its glory, and we will liberate Al-Aqsa, with Allah’s will, and we will liberate Iraq, with Allah’s will, and we will liberate the Muslim countries, invaded by murderers,” Farfur says in one episode that aired in April", Fox News Reported.

"It must be rememberd that every scrap of land, every person, every tribe, and every country currently under Muslim dominion was forcibly conquered and brought into submission--which probably should not surprise us since "submission" is actually the meaning of the word 'Islam,'" states historian, George Grant.

Immigration Policy & U.S. Security:

No doubt, by allowing Islamists to immigrate into the U.S., who indoctrinate their children in the manner of Hamas, we will begin to see, in a generation or two (10-20 years), the same type of home grown Islamic militants we see in foreign countries today.

Israel has been warning us about this enemy. If not quelled now, the Islamic revolution will be transplanted here.

Islam is a revolutionary expansionist ideology: the goal is to chip away at the nations until all men in the world will submit to Allah and his prophet.

Should we allow certain people or groups to immigrate into the United States who hold to a system or ideology whose core belief denies, will not recognize, or whose practices nullify inalienable rights?

6 Muslims Plot Massive Deadly Attack on Servicemen on U.S. Soil

Six Islamic men today were arrested, by the FBI who thwarted a major plot by the men to "kill as many military servicemen as possible". Checks with Immigration and Customs Enforcement show only one of the six men is a U.S. citizen, three are illegally here, and two had working permits. All were formerly from other countries.

Quote from The Associated Press
Source: FBI, U.S. Attorney's Office for New Jersey.

  • NAME: Shain Duka
  • AGE: 26; Born January 1981 in the former Yugoslavia. Ethnic Albanian.
  • LIVES: Cherry Hill, N.J.
  • IMMIGRATION STATUS: In United States illegally.
  • OCCUPATION: Operates roofing businesses with his brothers.

  • NAME: Eljvir Duka.ALIASES: Elvis Duka, Sulayman.
  • AGE: 23; Born in the former Yugoslavia. Ethnic Albanian.LIVES: Cherry Hill, N.J.
  • IMMIGRATION STATUS: In United States illegally.
  • OCCUPATION: Operates roofing businesses with his brothers.

  • NAME: Serdar Tatar.AGE: 23; Born in Turkey.
  • HOME: Philadelphia.
  • IMMIGRATION STATUS: Legal U.S. resident.
  • OCCUPATION: Works at a 7-Eleven store in Philadelphia.

  • NAME: Agron Abdullahu.AGE: 24; Born September 1982 in the former Yugoslavia. Ethnic Albanian.
  • LIVES: Buena Vista Township, N.J.
  • IMMIGRATION STATUS: Legal U.S. resident.
  • OCCUPATION: Works at a Shop-Rite supermarket.

From Fox News I got this list

  • Dritan Duka (illegal citizen)
  • Eljvir Duka (illegal citizen)
  • Shain Duka (illegal citizen)
  • Mohamad Ibrahim Shnewer
  • Serdar Tatar
  • Agron Abdullahu

Officials said

  • 4 from Yugoslavia (Formerly Communist)
  • 1 from Jordan (Islamic country)
  • 1 fromTurkey (Islamic country)

"All had lived in the United States for years. Three were in the United States illegally, two had work permits, and the other is a U.S. citizen," Fox News reported.

Immigration Policy & U.S. Security:
Islam is a revolutionary expansionist ideology: the goal is to chip away at the nations until all men in the world will submit to Allah and his prophet.

Should we allow certain people or groups to immigrate into the United States who hold to a system or ideology whose core belief denies, will not recognize, or whose practices nullify inalienable rights?

Inalienable rights mean that a human being has certain rights that are inherit in man, that transcend all cultural practices, traditions, values, or laws.

We have seen a recent influx of Islamic immigrants into Canada and Europe who have begun to request and demand that their laws be separate from the host nation. Islamists want Sharia law as their law. They want to judge their women by it, punish their children with it, and function autonomously from the laws of the land. In fact Muslims claim that Mohammed demands it! They claim that wherever they become a majority they are commanded to inact Sharia law.

Yesterday Fox news reported on Hamaz TV's indoctrination program for children to make them into militant Islamists, glorifying suicide attacks, bombings and machine gun attacks upon civilians. If we allow such people to immigrate here into the U.S., who indoctrinate their children, foment hatred for the country that gives them so much, will we not begin to see in a generation or two (10-20 years) the same type of home grown Islamic militants we see in foreign countries today? Israel has been warning us about this enemy. If not quelled now, the Islamic revolution will be transplanted here.

Full FBI Complaint:
http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/terrorism/usduka50707cmp.pdf

Sunday, May 6, 2007

Suicide Attacks increase: Paradise Gauranteed

MSNBC is reporting that suicide attacks are increasing as Taliban leaders are finding more recruits willing to don the vest that will guarantee them into paradise. The Taliban are using the suicide attackers to drive out American forces, hoping to regain their control over Afghanistan.

It remains to be seen weather in the U.S. a Democratically held congress will begin to direct their attention for an Afghanistan pullout, if the U.S. Military Personnel death toll begins to increase in that country. It must be remembered that Afghanistan was protected home of Al Queda, who declared war upon the U.S. during the Clinton administration, and launched the most deadly attack on U.S. Soil during President Bush's first year in office.

Will the U.S. democratically held congress recognize Islam as the violent revolutionary expansionist ideology it really is?

The goal is to chip away at the nations until all governments and men in the world submit to Allah and his prophet.

Or will congress treat those who see the writing on the wall, and the enemy within as "McCarthyism", and belittle and marginalize them?

The Question of Inalienable rights and those willing to defend it are juxtaposed against an enemy who does not recognize the Judeo-Christian principles derived from the Law of Moses.

Dying in the midst of battle while bringing all mankind under the submission of Allah and his prophet, has always been the promise of Mohammed. Most scholars agree that the only absolute guarantee for a Muslim to go to paradise is to die in the midst of battle.

The categories for the use of Jihad has grown to include anyone who simply opposes Islam by holding another set of beliefs or values. Sheik Omar Abdel-Rahman declared that "anyone who opposes Islam should be put to death." As a result Egyptian president Anwar Al Sadat was assassinated, Christian Copts in Egypt were targeted, killed, plundered and their wealth used to wage more jihad. Because the Jews oppose Jerusalem being the capital of the Islamic Palestinian state, they are classified as opposers of Islam and Jihad is proclaimed against them until Israel is wiped off the face earth.

During the Barbary Powers, one of the most interesting facts of this piece of history is the discovery made by Thomas Jefferson as to the motivation of why the Muslim Pirates were attacking American ships unprovoked:

"The Ambassador answered us that it was founded in our laws of their Prophet [Mohammed] - that it was written in their Koran that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners; that is was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners; and that every Musselman [Muslim] who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise" Thomas Jefferson

I was ordered to fight all men until they say, 'There is no god but Allah.'" Mohammed's farewell address, March 632 A.D.

Link to Article:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18505676/site/newsweek/

Friday, May 4, 2007

Kurdish Girl Stoned to Death

Mob Rule Rules in Islamic Iraq

A video of a 17-year old Kurdish girl of the minority Yezidi group is stoned to death for having a "relationship" with a Sunni Muslim boy. The cell-phone video that made its way onto uTube clearly showed a young girl laying motionless on the dirt-street, half stripped and naked, with a large cinder block resting against the back of her head. A mob of men encircle her, as the whole town looks on, doing nothing. According to The London Daily Mail, even a local Iraqi security force witnessed the killing, but did nothing to stop it.

"A large crowd watched as eight or nine men dragged Aswad from a house, and then hurled stones at her for about 30 minutes until she was dead," stated the London Daily Mail. If their assumptions of the young kurish girl were true, and it turned out to be proven that she did have an illicit affair with her Sunni boyfriend, what would happen if she was found to be pregnant? Did the villagers commit a double homicide? Do the ancient laws forbid the stoning of pregnant women?

"An Amnesty International spokesman in London said they receive frequent reports of honor crimes from Iraq – particularly in the predominantly Kurdish north. Most victims are women and girls who are considered by male relatives to have shamed their families by immoral behavior," reported Fox News.

Object Lesson:
Inalienable rights are given by God to ensure that Mob Rule does NOT rule. God instituted the Civil Magistrate under the law of Moses, so that the individual had the right to defend oneself in a court of law against potentially false and presumptuous accusers in the presence of impartial and objective judges.

Case Law, Biblical Norms, and The Error of The Yezidi and Sunni Elders
Christ turned away the Pharisees from stoning the woman caught in adultery because her accusers were not fulfilling the law of Moses: It takes two to have an affair, and the man wasn't present with the woman.


If the accusers were found to be lying or had tainted, withheld, or tampered with the evidence, they would receive the punishment they intended upon their victims; thus, fulfilling the dictum, "an eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth." The "eye for an eye..." mandate was to insure honesty and protection for the accused. This safegaurded people, and made accusers far more careful before bringing an accusation against someone. The accuser also had to be the first to stone the accused if found guilty by their own evidence. In other words, by "your own hand did you bring this about, to end this person's life, and you swear before God, that if this is not true, may God return upon you the same judgment you are casting the first stone upon".

Under Mosaic law and the Law of Christ it is a sin for a private citizen to take the law into your their own hands and act as juror and judge. Under the Old Testament, there had to be two or three witnesses, they had to be brought before the elders at the gates of the city, and they had to have the accusers stand before the tribunal and prove it.

Under the New Testament, Christians are absolutely forbidden to take justice into their own hands, They can sue for justice in a court of law. They can call the magistrate to arrest and apprehend a criminal. And only if they themselves are in personal danger can they defend themselves with appropriate force. But Christ makes it clear, "Do NOT return evil for evil. Pray for those who despitefully use you." It is both a sin and punishable offense to take personal vengeance upon another person of the community for suspected illicit behavior. God said, "vengeance is mine says the Lord, I will repay." Only is the civil magistrate allowed to punish the "evil doer".

the Westminster Confession of Faith is one of the key landmarks of Western Civilization for defining the role of the "state" and their "magistrates" (legally elected officials, monarchs, or rulers, etc.). Listen to what it says:

Infidelity, or difference in religion, does not make void the magistrates' just and legal authority, nor free the people from their due obedience to them. God, the supreme Lord and King of all the world, has ordained civil magistrates, to be, under Him, over the people, for His own glory, and the public good: and, to this end, has armed them with the power of the sword, for the defence and encouragement of them that are good, and for the punishment of evil doers.

Hey! What happened "cultural relativism" and multicultural values? It appears we are guilty then of assuming that everyone believes that inalienable rights truly exist. But if we are to be consistent with the "scientific" dictum taught in anthropology, we shouldn't be judging any other culture by any ethic or moral standard other than that found within it's own culture. I should just shrug and say, "Hey! If inalienable rights don't exist in that country or culture, who am I to judge?" I should liberate myself! Shake free any ethnocentrism, and be-numb myself when I hear of the corpses of little children tossed into ditches on the sides of highways like filthy rubbish, or rushed to judgment "honor killings" by stoning. Apparently, the Yezidi and Sunnis are being very "vigilent" under a different set of values.

Yet we see this in our "multcultural" lovefest society... Kate Allen, the organisation’s UK director believes in "inalienable rights" and upholding universal human rights. She's stated as saying, "This young girl’s murder is truly abhorrent and her killers must be brought to justice." She obviously believes that justice is an ojbective truth, and not arbitrarily defined by the will of the majority in ones culture.

Link to Video:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=5GM5Piuy8ac

Thursday, May 3, 2007

Jizyah Tribute, and Islamic Persecution of Iraqi Christians

Look at how the Islamists are trying to "protect" the Christians from, I don't know who (Muslims maybe?), by making them pay the "jizyah" protection tax. Muslims are so very philanthropic to pass the hat around like that.
"Thousands of Christian families are being told to leave the country or convert to Islam or pay the jizyah (a tax traditionally imposed on non-Muslim men in Islamic states)..." [and] "Hundreds of Christians have been abducted and murdered and their churches have been destroyed as part of a detailed plan implemented by Muslim extremists..."

I was ordered to fight all men until they say, 'There is no god but Allah.'" Mohammed's farewell address, March 632 A.D.

Jisyah makes all men NOT equal
Jizyah is actually an ancient Islamic form of tribute levied against the conquered group by the conqueror. Modern Islamists have been making Eyptian Coptics pay the jizyah for decades in certain egyptian neighborhoods. The pretence used by the islamists is "protection". , To add insult to injury, jizyah is also an insult against any group the "tax" is levied upon, signifying that they are a conquered sub-group, with less protection than their Islamic neighbors--another infringement upon inalienable rights.

As the Islamists grow in power, the jizyah is now being levied upon non-muslims in Iraq. It's all a little bit of history repeating. Wake up America. Jihad is coming to a neighborhood near you, unless of course you demand from your congressman or woman the curtailment of Islamic immigration in the U.S.

Jizyah is currently being levied or emerging in the following countries: Egypt, Sudan, Israel, and Iraq.

Link to Article:
http://www.adnki.com/index_2Level.php?cat=Religion&loid=8.0.409259200&par=0

Wednesday, May 2, 2007

Iranian Vigilantes Cleared of Murder

Vigilantism is not above the law in Iran; it is the law in Iran.

Sunday, 15 April 2007:
The BBC reported that Islamic "vigilantes" who went on a killing spree in a number of gruesome murders were found Innocent by the Iranian Supreme Court. "The killers said they believed Islam let them spill the blood of anyone engaged in illicit activities if they issued two warnings to the victims. " "The vigilantes were not guilty because their victims were involved in un-Islamic activities, the [Iranian] court found." A vigilante, according to Webster's dictionary, is "a member of a volunteer committee organized to suppress and punish crime". So, actually in Islamic law, vigilantism is perceived as a virtue.

It's interesting to note that what the Iranian vigilantes did in Iran would clearly be seen as a crime in America, but what the Minute Men are doing in the U.S. is clearly legal, Constitutional vigilantism; yet however, they are considered as criminals by many.

The Iranian Supreme Court concluded, the perpetrators were not criminals but faithful Muslims, who had functioned within the rubric of Sharia law. Anyone is commanded to submit to Allah and acknowledge His prophet Muhammad.

Everyone can warn their neighbor twice that they are involved in un-Islamic behavior. If a Muslim or non-Muslim is found engaging in illicit activities, they can be warned twice. If not heeded, apparently, any citizen has the right to execute that person.

"The case raises serious questions about vigilantes in Iran taking justice into their own hands and undermining the rule of law. "

This previous statement was made by a "Western" reporter's point of view. After all, a vigilante in western terms is used for those take matters into their own hands, functioning outside the law of their society, as juror and judge. It appears Frances Harrison, the person who reported this story, inserted his Western view of the "law": Life, Liberty, and Property protected by the state, and guaranteed under due process. But whose "law" is Francis talking about? Moses' or Mohammed's?

According to the Iranian court, the perpetrators were not acting outside the law, or above the law--they were working within the law. Perhaps we have been looking at the executions through our Western eyes. We just assume they're thinking the same way as we do about people's rights. But actually, they are very much working in the Sharia paradigm.

Do you believe universal inalienable rights exist, even if a society doesn't recognize them?

I found the statement above to be very illuminating. Why didn't I see this before? Of course the Iranian courts ruled not guilty. This can really help us in our understanding of the current wide-spread killing in Iraq. We've been looking into the death and carnage as an absolute failure of a U.S. policy, and with total bewilderment at the murderous acts of the Iraqis. If universal inalienable rights do not exist, then we've been looking at Iraq with our own "Western" ethnocentrism. What looks like chaos and civil war is actually the ancient, societal norms in which Muslims are called upon by their prophet to solve the problems of immorality, eradicate blasphemy, and subdue their enemies.

After all, have we not all been taught in college or experienced the trickle down effect of liberal teaching of relativism that one culture should not be judge by the traditions of another culture? It appears we are guilty then of assuming that everyone believes that inalienable rights should apply. But if we are to be consistent with the "scientific" dictum taught in anthropology, we shouldn't be judging any other culture by any ethic or moral standard other than that found within it's own culture. I should just shrug and say, "Hey! If inalienable rights don't exist in that country or culture, who am I to judge?" Liberate yourself! Shake yourself free from any ethnocentrism, and be-numb yourself when you hear of the bullet riddled corpses of little children tossed into ditches on the sides of highways like filthy rubbish. Apparently, the Shiites and Sunnis are being very "vigilent" under a different set of values.

Link to Article: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6557679.stm

Al-Qaeda is not our first war against Islamic Terrorists

America's Early Confrontation with Islam

America has been at war with Islamic terrorists before, and it's a sad case to justapose our founding fathers response against our current elected officials in Washington. In the middle of his new article entitled "An Historical Perspective on a Muslim Being Sworn into Congress on the Koran, historian, David Barton traces the history of the United States confrontation with Islamic terrorism on the high seas. They didn't call it "terrorism" then, but "Piracy". And although the terminolgy for the Islamic behavior may have changed over the years, the beliefs and motivations that drive Muslims has not.

The war is known as the Barbary Powers. It lasted 32 years, spanned the U.S. Presidency of four administrations, and until this conflict arose, the United States did not have it's own navy. To ensure the safety of American commerce and its citizens, President John Adams commissioned the U.S. Navy to be built. This is an intersting note in history, given our present circumstances with the rise of Islamic imperialism in the 21st century: Because of Islamic terrorism/piracy on the high seas, we have a U.S. Navy today. Did you catch that?! The U.S. Navy was borne out of the need to confront an Islamic enemy!

One of the most interesting facts of this piece of history is the discovery made by Thomas Jefferson as to the motivation of why the Muslim Pirates were attacking American ships unprovoked:



"The Ambassador answered us that it was founded in our laws of their Prophet [Mohammed] - that it was written in their Koran that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners; that is was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners; and that every Musselman [Muslim] who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise" Thomas Jefferson

David Barton is the founder of Wallbuilders, and owns the largest private library of the original writings by the founding fathers of the United States, next to The Library of Congress.

Download the article: An Historical Perspective on a Muslim Being Sworn into Congress on the Koran